Skip to content

Chore: Create GH PR Template PQE-409#51

Merged
ykaiboussiSO merged 1 commit intomainfrom
PQE-409
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

Chore: Create GH PR Template PQE-409#51
ykaiboussiSO merged 1 commit intomainfrom
PQE-409

Conversation

@ykaiboussiSO
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ykaiboussiSO ykaiboussiSO commented Mar 27, 2026

Implement pull_request_template.md to standardize the PR review process.

Closes: PQE-409

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a standardized GitHub pull request template to improve the contribution process. The template features predefined sections for change descriptions, change type categorization, testing details, optional screenshots, driver impact verification for PostgreSQL and Neo4j databases, and comprehensive quality checklists.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Walkthrough

Added a new GitHub pull request template at .github/pull_request_template.md with predefined sections including issue references, change type selection, testing details, optional screenshots, database driver impact checkboxes for PostgreSQL and Neo4j, and a general verification checklist.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Pull Request Template
.github/pull_request_template.md
New template file with structured PR description sections: issue reference, change type selection, testing information, optional screenshots, driver impact checkboxes (PostgreSQL/Neo4j), and completion checklist for formatting, tests, and dependency documentation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A template so neat, with sections so clear,
To organize changes we hold quite dear,
With checkboxes checked and stories aligned,
Pull requests now flow with structure by design! 📋✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Chore: Create GH PR Template PQE-409' clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a GitHub pull request template, which matches the actual changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch PQE-409

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)

12-12: Consider American spelling for consistency.

The word "behaviour" uses British spelling. For consistency with standard technical documentation conventions, consider using the American spelling "behavior".

📝 Proposed spelling fix
-- [ ] Refactor (no behaviour change)
+- [ ] Refactor (no behavior change)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.github/pull_request_template.md at line 12, Update the checkbox label text
"[ ] Refactor (no behaviour change)" to use American spelling by replacing
"behaviour" with "behavior"; locate the line containing that exact label in the
pull request template and edit it so it reads "[ ] Refactor (no behavior
change)" to maintain consistent spelling across documentation.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In @.github/pull_request_template.md:
- Line 12: Update the checkbox label text "[ ] Refactor (no behaviour change)"
to use American spelling by replacing "behaviour" with "behavior"; locate the
line containing that exact label in the pull request template and edit it so it
reads "[ ] Refactor (no behavior change)" to maintain consistent spelling across
documentation.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2dca45a3-8df8-4d35-94e5-e185394bda45

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec6ffe0 and 00ac27e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zinic zinic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@ykaiboussiSO ykaiboussiSO merged commit 82497a4 into main Mar 30, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants