Skip to content

Use the RESPONSE env var and add safety to prompt for actions/ai-inference use in issue summary starter#3216

Merged
heavymachinery merged 1 commit intoactions:mainfrom
garman:main
Feb 26, 2026
Merged

Use the RESPONSE env var and add safety to prompt for actions/ai-inference use in issue summary starter#3216
heavymachinery merged 1 commit intoactions:mainfrom
garman:main

Conversation

@garman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@garman garman commented Feb 25, 2026

Pre-requisites


Please note that at this time we are only accepting new starter workflows for Code Scanning. Updates to existing starter workflows are fine.


Tasks

For all workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be contained in a .yml file with the language or platform as its filename, in lower, kebab-cased format (for example, docker-image.yml). Special characters should be removed or replaced with words as appropriate (for example, "dotnet" instead of ".NET").
  • Should use sentence case for the names of workflows and steps (for example, "Run tests").
  • Should be named only by the name of the language or platform (for example, "Go", not "Go CI" or "Go Build").
  • Should include comments in the workflow for any parts that are not obvious or could use clarification.
  • Should specify least privileged permissions for GITHUB_TOKEN so that the workflow runs successfully.

For CI workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be preserved under the ci directory.
  • Should include a matching ci/properties/*.properties.json file (for example, ci/properties/docker-publish.properties.json).
  • Should run on push to branches: [ $default-branch ] and pull_request to branches: [ $default-branch ].
  • Packaging workflows should run on release with types: [ created ].
  • Publishing workflows should have a filename that is the name of the language or platform, in lower case, followed by "-publish" (for example, docker-publish.yml).

For Code Scanning workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be preserved under the code-scanning directory.
  • Should include a matching code-scanning/properties/*.properties.json file (for example, code-scanning/properties/codeql.properties.json), with properties set as follows:
    • name: Name of the Code Scanning integration.
    • creator: Name of the organization/user producing the Code Scanning integration.
    • description: Short description of the Code Scanning integration.
    • categories: Array of languages supported by the Code Scanning integration.
    • iconName: Name of the SVG logo representing the Code Scanning integration. This SVG logo must be present in the icons directory.
  • Should run on push to branches: [ $default-branch, $protected-branches ] and pull_request to branches: [ $default-branch ]. We also recommend a schedule trigger of cron: $cron-weekly (for example, codeql.yml).

Some general notes:

  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by GitHub, in the actions organization, or
  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by the language or ecosystem that the workflow supports. These actions must be published to the GitHub Marketplace. We require that these actions be referenced using the full 40 character hash of the action's commit instead of a tag. Additionally, workflows must include the following comment at the top of the workflow file:
    # This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub.
    # They are provided by a third-party and are governed by
    # separate terms of service, privacy policy, and support
    # documentation.
    
  • Automation and CI workflows should not send data to any 3rd party service except for the purposes of installing dependencies.
  • Automation and CI workflows cannot be dependent on a paid service or product.

@garman garman marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2026 19:33
@garman garman requested review from a team as code owners February 25, 2026 19:33
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 25, 2026 19:33
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the issue-summary automation workflow to be more robust against prompt injection and to safely pass the model output into the gh CLI comment command.

Changes:

  • Strengthen the inference prompt with explicit instructions to treat issue title/body as untrusted input and only produce a short summary.
  • Switch the gh issue comment invocation to use an environment variable ($RESPONSE) rather than inlining the output expression.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@garman garman changed the title use the envvar and improve prompt for inference Use the RESPONSE env var and add safety to prompt for actions/ai-inference use in issue summary starter Feb 25, 2026
@heavymachinery heavymachinery merged commit affda94 into actions:main Feb 26, 2026
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants