Update github runners to oci gh arc runners

[koksay]

Description

CNCF has hosted ephemeral GitHub runners on Oracle that we want projects to use instead of the GitHub-hosted ones, which now incur a cost to use.

Please direct any questions to me, @jeefy, @krook, and @RobertKielty. (or #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack)

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle could you please take a look, I am not sure how CNCF handles this and how Dapr Java SDK should be affected.

[cicoyle]

Hello @koksay - thanks for the PR here. Mind providing a link to a discussion or where I may find more information about the reason for this change?

Was there a particular reason for the dapr/java-sdk being chosen for this change? From a dapr ecosystem perspective, we will want consistency across all SDKs.

[koksay]

Hi @cicoyle, the main reason is the cost of the runners (for some projects, it's runners on Equinix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this change. @jeefy can provide more information here, or you can also join the #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack and ask any questions you may have.

[cicoyle]

inix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this chang

Will join and ask for clarification in the slack channel and provide additional context here for future reference

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle is this still relevant? I am wondering if we could close this PR.

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle @salaboy could follow up with someone from CNCF and figure what can we do here and if we should do anything.

[koksay]

Hey @artur-ciocanu, sorry — I didn't follow up on this PR. It's still relevant, for sure. As I stated at the beginning, these runners are no longer free, and we need to move all of them to the CNCF-hosted runners. I think

@cicoyle mentioned on Slack that you prefer to align all SDKs; you may move the others as well. Here are the runner types:

# amd64
oracle-vm-2cpu-8gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-4cpu-16gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-16cpu-64gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-24cpu-96gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-32cpu-128gb-x86-64

# arm64
oracle-vm-2cpu-8gb-arm64
oracle-vm-4cpu-16gb-arm64
oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64
oracle-vm-16cpu-64gb-arm64
oracle-vm-24cpu-96gb-arm64
oracle-vm-32cpu-128gb-arm64

cc: @jeefy

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle and @salaboy are you OK with this PR, should we merge it?

[salaboy]

Yes I think we should move forward - Blog: http://salaboy.com <http://salaboy.wordpress.com> - Github user: http://github.com/salaboy - Twitter: http://twitter.com/salaboy - Mauricio "Salaboy" Salatino -

…

On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 06:02, codecov[bot] ***@***.***> wrote: *codecov[bot]* left a comment (dapr/java-sdk#1326) <#1326 (comment)> Codecov <https://app.codecov.io/gh/dapr/java-sdk/pull/1326?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dapr> Report ✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. ✅ Project coverage is 78.67%. Comparing base (d759c53 <https://app.codecov.io/gh/dapr/java-sdk/commit/d759c53f8c110fac13056e3d484a3e5f233e0dad?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dapr>) to head (397f392 <https://app.codecov.io/gh/dapr/java-sdk/commit/397f39223043c8a475ae515864095902e3bc3571?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dapr> ). ⚠️ Report is 241 commits behind head on master. Additional details and impacted files @@ Coverage Diff @@## master #1326 +/- ## ============================================+ Coverage 76.91% 78.67% +1.76% - Complexity 1592 1957 +365 ============================================ Files 145 217 +72 Lines 4843 5970 +1127 Branches 562 661 +99 ============================================+ Hits 3725 4697 +972 - Misses 821 932 +111 - Partials 297 341 +44 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry <https://app.codecov.io/gh/dapr/java-sdk/pull/1326?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dapr> . 📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here <https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=dapr> . 🚀 New features to boost your workflow: - ❄️ Test Analytics <https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics>: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1326 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACCMXQO4U6KSXYJEWJSHPT4AUA6BAVCNFSM6AAAAAB4CLKTH2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTMMRUHAYDONBUG4> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle do you see any issues in approving this PR, should I try to merge

[koksay]

@artur-ciocanu @cicoyle Sorry, I forgot to follow up on this PR. Would you please take a look at it?

[cicoyle]

@cicoyle do you see any issues in approving this PR, should I try to merge

I retriggered CI - I see no issue merging as long as CI is 🟢 👍🏻

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.77%. Comparing base (4396215) to head (275c3f1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1326      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.76%   76.77%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     2260     2259       -1     
============================================
  Files           241      241              
  Lines          7066     7066              
  Branches        740      740              
============================================
+ Hits           5424     5425       +1     
+ Misses         1279     1277       -2     
- Partials        363      364       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Stale review that has been resolved in the comments