Skip to content

Screenshot#5

Open
jlstewart379 wants to merge 5 commits intoleviwilson:masterfrom
jlstewart379:screenshot
Open

Screenshot#5
jlstewart379 wants to merge 5 commits intoleviwilson:masterfrom
jlstewart379:screenshot

Conversation

@jlstewart379
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Taking a screenshot with furter.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 99c9c53 on jlstewart379:screenshot into c90d837 on leviwilson:master.

@leviwilson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

spec / scenario?

@jlstewart379
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

So a scenario verifying that the folder and file are actually created?...And a spec showing that the method calls frankly_screenshot. I thought maybe furter.rb was above testing since I don't think I saw anything in there for it yet... :)

@leviwilson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

There is some other logic in there that could be covered by specs as well.
I'm actually surprised that coveralls didn't pick it up.
On May 29, 2013 7:28 AM, "Jeremy Stewart" notifications@github.com wrote:

So a scenario verifying that the folder and file are actually
created?...And a spec showing that the method calls frankly_screenshot. I
thought maybe furter.rb was above testing since I don't think I saw
anything in there for it yet... :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/5#issuecomment-18610144
.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling be635dc on jlstewart379:screenshot into c90d837 on leviwilson:master.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling 33d60d7 on jlstewart379:screenshot into c90d837 on leviwilson:master.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same when pulling a26692c on jlstewart379:screenshot into c90d837 on leviwilson:master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants