update `nodegyp-test-pull-request`

[refack]

Re: nodejs/node-gyp#1212

1. We should add node8 to the fan
2. For node-gyp@4.x.x we will only support node >= 4
   node-gyp@3 will go into "LTS"

So I assume we need a matrix?

[bnoordhuis]

I wasn't planning on maintaining branches for v0.10 and v0.12 once we bump major. Was anyone else and if so, why?

[joaocgreis]

• Added Node version 8
• Node versions 0.x will only run if node-gyp < 4 (so this will simply work if we ever create a v3.x branch)

I believe that takes care of it, so I'll close. Please reopen if I missed something.

[refack]

I wasn't planning on maintaining branches for v0.10 and v0.12 once we bump major. Was anyone else and if so, why?

nodejs/node-gyp#1212 (comment) If someone finds a new bug (especially on Windows, "Windows user are not happy" and all that Jazz) 🤷‍♂️ personally I have no problem helping them.
So maybe LTS is the wrong comparison, more like "lazy-copy-on-write-maintenance"?

[refack]

@joaocgreis 👍 Looking good
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/nodegyp-test-pull-request/27/

[refack]

Re: nodejs/node-gyp@75cfae2
If I jumped the gun, shoot me.

[gibfahn]

So maybe LTS is the wrong comparison, more like "lazy-copy-on-write-maintenance"?

I think the right statement is "we might consider doing another release on a case-by-case basis".