OCPBUGS-36155: Disallow changing node selector after initial deployment

[suleymanakbas91]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36155, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.92308% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 57.78%. Comparing base (748fb1b) to head (53bac03).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #649      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.33%   57.78%   -0.55%     
==========================================
  Files          54       53       -1     
  Lines        4258     4212      -46     
==========================================
- Hits         2484     2434      -50     
- Misses       1525     1533       +8     
+ Partials      249      245       -4     

Files	Coverage Δ
api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_webhook.go	84.36% <76.92%> (-0.43%)	⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[suleymanakbas91]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36155, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @radeore

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@suleymanakbas91: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jakobmoellerdev, suleymanakbas91

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jakobmoellerdev,suleymanakbas91]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@suleymanakbas91: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36155: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/lvm-operator#649

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-36155 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.