Bug Report
1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)
CREATE TABLE t0(c0 int);
CREATE TABLE t1(c0 DECIMAL);
INSERT INTO t1(c0) VALUES (1687);
INSERT INTO t0(c0) VALUES (0);
CREATE VIEW v0(c0) AS SELECT CAST(((t1.c0)DIV(t1.c0)) AS DECIMAL) FROM t1;
SELECT * FROM v0 INNER JOIN t0 ON ( (v0.c0 LIKE CAST(v0.c0 AS CHAR) ) <= (((t0.c0))) AND ((NOT (ATAN2(t0.c0, v0.c0)))) );
2. What did you expect to see? (Required)
3. What did you see instead (Required)
1.000000000000000000000000000000 , 0
More importantly, if I just create a identical table instead of using view:
CREATE TABLE t0(c0 int);
INSERT INTO t0(c0) VALUES (0);
CREATE TABLE v0(c0 DECIMAL);
INSERT INTO v0(c0) VALUES (1.00000);
SELECT * FROM v0 INNER JOIN t0 ON ( (v0.c0 LIKE CAST(v0.c0 AS CHAR) ) <= (((t0.c0))) AND ((NOT (ATAN2(t0.c0, v0.c0)))) );
It will produce correct result which is same as that of mysql.
4. What is your TiDB version? (Required)
Release Version: v9.0.0-beta.1.pre-389-g21f9bb7b7a
Edition: Community
Git Commit Hash: 21f9bb7b7a7478d825c4dee4fbf2ce913e3e7cf1
Git Branch: HEAD
UTC Build Time: 2025-03-11 09:37:34
GoVersion: go1.23.7
Race Enabled: false
Check Table Before Drop: false
Store: tikv |
Bug Report
1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)
2. What did you expect to see? (Required)
3. What did you see instead (Required)
More importantly, if I just create a identical table instead of using view:
It will produce correct result which is same as that of mysql.
4. What is your TiDB version? (Required)