Skip to content

[fix] Handle negative big ints correctly#560

Merged
cedric-cordenier merged 1 commit intomainfrom
handle-negative-big-ints
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

[fix] Handle negative big ints correctly#560
cedric-cordenier merged 1 commit intomainfrom
handle-negative-big-ints

Conversation

@cedric-cordenier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment thread pkg/values/pb/values.proto
Comment thread pkg/values/pb/values.proto Outdated
List list_value = 5;
string decimal_value = 6;
int64 int64_value = 7;
bytes bigint_value = 8;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there is a formal way to reserve or deprecate this field

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added that on line 8 or did you have something else in mind?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I just expected it to be inline here inside of the oneof - does it matter?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jmank88 jmank88 Jun 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These is also this option:

bytes bigint_value = 8 [deprecated = true];

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants