Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
socksy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess the vals could all be in quotes to be consistent?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/release.yml:
- Around line 310-313: In the custom-publish-npm job in release.yml, remove the
unnecessary "packages: \"write\"" permission from the permissions block so only
"contents: read" and "id-token: write" remain; update the permissions
declaration used by the custom-publish-npm job to eliminate the packages write
scope (leave contents and id-token as-is) to follow least-privilege principles.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ec5380e6-ae25-4520-8a7f-1258721eb8e6
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml
Summary by CodeRabbit